For individuals who are engaged in the service of an organization or establishment, it is not uncommon to have the integrity of those in the leadership and/or management positions being called into question.
Integrity applies to “wholeness” of character, which is best described as doing the right thing even when no one is watching. It is aligned with the virtues of honesty, reliability, and sincerity. Moreover, it is often associated with consistency between one’s actions, values, and principles. Most importantly, integrity becomes compromised when hypocrisy, deceitfulness and insincerity are known to exist.
Within an organization, those who lead can demonstrate and exhibit their level of integrity by first taking responsibility for their actions. This can be followed by showing respect for everyone, committing oneself to helping those that you are called to serve and represent, displaying a non-self-approach by putting the needs of others above personal interest, helping those who are in need and showing a self of compassion and humility in dealing with others.
However, it does not end there, as it is prudent to display good communication, honesty, demonstrate a propensity to operate in a manner that does not denote clandestine behaviour such as the undermining of the efforts of others, not engaging in divide and rule tactics, and /or attempting to usurp authority. These are qualities and actions that would make most repose trust, confidence and respect in an individual as a leader.
There is the school of thought that the traits of an individual who demonstrates integrity, are identified as being consistent, reliable, respectful, courageous, and accountable. What stands out is the fact that the individual is not only expected to be consistent, but also demonstrates an uncompromising adherence to strong moral and ethical principles. There is the expectation that the individual will always do the right thing irrespective of the circumstances.
As a human, this may be a lot to ask, as no individual is perfect and is therefore likely to have some shortcomings. However, what makes the fundamental difference, resides in the way an individual sees him/herself as a role model.
It is difficult to conceive how an individual who is not fair in their dealings, acts without sincerity, promotes self interest and is opportunistic could be considered as a person of integrity. Based on the principles and traits described earlier, it is evident that integrity is built on a set of values.
In practice, the best way of observing these is by showing congruence, incorruptibility and self awareness. As it relates to congruence, this means that one’s words must align with one’s actions. As it pertains to incorruptibility, there is the expectation there will be the refusal to compromise ethical principles. Finally, self awareness becomes a critical factor, as it is about understanding one’s own value and living up to them.
This brings us back to looking at what constitutes a role model. The definition of a role model speaks to someone who is a positive influence, who can inspire others to imitate their good behaviour as part of their personal or professional development. This means embracing the values, actions and good examples which have been demonstrated.
Dennis De Peiza is a Labour Relations & Employment Relations Consultant with Regional Management Services Inc. Visit our Website: www.regionalmanagement service. com
The post OPINION: Leading with Integrity appeared first on Barbados Today.
